Completed
Tesla faces U.S. investigation following several self-driving vehicle crashes
UPDATED Selective US

US regulators investigate self-driving Teslas after multiple crashes

US Investigates Tesla Self-Driving Cars After Crashes

US regulators are examining Tesla's full self-driving technology after several crashes involved violations of traffic laws. Investigators received reports of dangerous behavior, raising safety concerns regarding 2.88 million vehicles.

  • Investigation includes 2.88 million Teslas
  • Crashes involved red light violations
  • Preliminary evaluation may lead to recalls
  • Reports indicate injuries from incidents
  • Tesla's FSD requires attentive drivers
  • Previous investigation ongoing for one year
  • System designed for driver intervention

US automobile safety regulators are investigating 2.88 million Tesla vehicles with full self-driving (FSD) technology due to several crashes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) claims the system has caused traffic safety violations.

Overview of NHTSA Investigation

The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched a federal investigation into Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, covering approximately 2.88 million vehicles equipped with FSD (Supervised and Beta versions). The inquiry follows reports alleging that Tesla’s FSD technology caused traffic law violations, including running red lights and driving against traffic during lane changes, resulting in several crashes and injuries.[1][2][3]

Reported Incidents and Complaints

  • NHTSA has received 58 incident reports linked to Tesla vehicles operating with FSD engaged.
  • Among these, there are 14 reported collisions and 23 reported injuries.
  • Six reports specifically describe Teslas entering intersections on red signals and subsequently crashing, with four crashes resulting in injuries.[2][3][4]
  • Additional complaints claim FSD failed to alert drivers of its intent or did not correctly detect and respond to traffic signals.[4][2]
  • Some drivers reported Tesla vehicles moving through red lights or stopping improperly, and some crashes occurred due to lack of driver warnings about FSD behavior near traffic controls.[5][2]

System Description and Limitations

Tesla’s FSD is a Level 2 driver-assistance system that requires drivers to remain fully attentive and prepared to take over at any moment. Despite its name, the system does not enable full vehicle autonomy and still mandates human supervision at all times.[3][6][2]

Tesla’s official guidance states that the driver must keep hands on the wheel and be fully engaged in driving tasks while FSD is active. The company has released recent software updates intended to improve lane management, intersection behavior, and traffic signal recognition to reduce safety issues.[6][2]

Context of Investigation

This newest investigation builds upon earlier regulatory scrutiny. In late 2024, NHTSA began inquiries into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles after crashes occurred in low-visibility conditions such as fog, sun glare, and airborne dust. One incident in 2023 involved a fatality. Additionally, legal challenges have mounted against Tesla regarding driver assistance system safety, including trials resulting in damages awarded for accidents involving Autopilot, a related but distinct system from FSD.[7][8][5][4]

Investigation Scope and Possible Outcomes

NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is examining whether Tesla provided adequate warnings, whether the system’s behavior allowed drivers sufficient reaction time, and how accurately the FSD system detects and responds to road signals, lane markings, and wrong-way signs.[9][1]

If the agency determines that Tesla’s FSD represents a significant safety risk, a recall of affected vehicles could be initiated. The investigation remains at the preliminary evaluation stage.[1][4]

Rachel Patel

Rachel Patel

Senior News Editor

US Business

Rachel Patel is a senior news editor and journalist specializing in political journalism and digital media. With over seven years of professional experience, she is recognized for her accuracy, source verification, and audience-focused reporting approach. Rachel earned her M.S. in Journalism & Media Studies from Stanford University (2018), where she developed expertise in media ethics, political communication, and digital storytelling. Her career has centered on bridging traditional political reporting with the fast-paced world of online journalism. She has contributed to major global media outlets, analyzing how digital platforms — from YouTube and Reddit to TikTok and Bluesky — shape political narratives, influence public opinion, and redefine news consumption. Now based in Berlin, Germany, Rachel serves as a Senior News Editor at Faharas NET, leading coverage on digital politics, media literacy, and social communication trends in the modern information landscape.

85
Articles
1.2K
Views
31
Shares
Theguardian

Theguardian

Primary Source

No coverage areas yet

Theguardian.com is the digital heartbeat of a 204-year-old newspaper that refuses to erect a paywall. Since migrating online in 1999, the site has grown into a 24-hour global newsroom serving 25 million unique browsers each day, with two-thirds of that traffic originating outside the United Kingdom. From a converted cotton mill in Kings Cross, 600 journalists file in English, Arabic and Hindi, while satellite bureaus in Sydney, Hong Kong, Washington, Lagos and Mexico City ensure the sun never sets on Guardian coverage. Investigative rigour remains the calling card. The 2013 Edward Snowden revelations, published in partnership with the Washington Post, exposed the NSA’s bulk-data dragnet and earned the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. More recently, the “Pegasus Project” consortium led by Guardian editors uncovered how military-grade spyware sold to 40 governments targeted journalists, human-rights lawyers and even heads of state; the series triggered parliamentary inquiries on four continents and export-license suspensions in Israel and Spain. Every leak undergoes a three-layer verification process: technical forensic analysis, legal consultation under UK defamation law, and an internal “sensitivity board” that weighs public interest against personal harm. The newsroom’s centre-left stance is declared in an editorial code posted on every page, yet opinion and reportage are physically separated. Columnists such as Owen Jones and Polly Toynbee argue for progressive taxation and climate action on dedicated “Comment is Free” pages, while breaking-news live-blogs use neutral phrasing and link to primary documents court filings, scientific papers, leaked spreadsheets so readers can audit sourcing in real time. This transparency ethos extends to corrections: errors are struck through in red at the top of articles, accompanied by a timestamp and editor’s note explaining what changed and why. Funding comes from readers, not advertisers. After watching digital ad rates plummet 40 % between 2016 and 2018, Guardian Media Group pivoted to a voluntary membership model. Supporters can contribute £5 a month or make one-time gifts; in return they receive fewer on-site appeals and access to the “Guardian Extra” newsletter that discloses upcoming investigations. By 2023 reader revenue exceeded £50 million annually, covering 55 % of editorial costs and insulating coverage from corporate pressure. No shareholder dividends are paid; profits are reinvested into climate, inequality and human-rights reporting. Sport, culture and lifestyle verticals attract younger audiences who may arrive for a Champions League match tracker and stay for long-reads on refugee policy. The “Football Weekly” podcast averages 1.2 million downloads per episode, while interactive guides such as “How to read the IPCC report in five charts” distill complex science into shareable visuals. Whether chronicling COP negotiations, live-blogging royal funerals or explaining why lettuce prices tripled overnight, theguardian.com delivers open-access journalism Platform financed by citizens who believe factual, fearless reporting is a public good worth paying for.

20
Articles
223
Views
0
Shares
Elena Voren

Elena Voren

Senior Editor

Blog Business Entertainment Sports News

Elena Voren is a senior journalist and Tech Section Editor with 8 years of experience focusing on AI ethics, social media impact, and consumer software. She is recognized for interviewing industry leaders and academic experts while clearly distinguishing opinion from evidence-based reporting. She earned her B.A. in Cognitive Science from the University of California, Berkeley (2016), where she studied human-computer interaction, AI, and digital behavior. Elena’s work emphasizes the societal implications of technology, ensuring readers understand both the practical and ethical dimensions of emerging tools. She leads the Tech Section at Faharas NET, supervising coverage on AI, consumer software, digital society, and privacy technologies, while maintaining rigorous editorial standards. Based in Berlin, Germany, Elena provides insightful analyses on technology trends, ethical AI deployment, and the influence of social platforms on modern life.

0
Articles
0
Views
0
Shares
410
Updates
faharasnet

faharasnet

Fact-Checking

Artificial Intelligence Blog Business Entertainment

No description yet

0
Articles
0
Views
0
Shares
132
Reviews

Editorial Timeline

Revisions
— by Elena Voren
Add SEO improvements
— by Kamar Mahmoud
Added new relevant secondary sources
— by Kamar Mahmoud
Initial publication.

Correction Record

Accountability
— by Kamar Mahmoud
  1. - Added precise number of vehicles under investigation (2.88 million)
  2. - Included total incident and crash counts (58 incidents, 14 crashes)
  3. - Incorporated specific injury data (23 injuries reported)
  4. - Detailed nature of violations (red light running, wrong-lane driving)
  5. - Explained FSD system limitations and driver responsibility
  6. - Referenced prior investigations and fatal accidents in 2023-2024
  7. - Described NHTSA's evaluation focus (warnings, reaction times)
  8. - Mentioned Tesla's software updates and company statements
  9. - Included legal context about prior liability and wrongful death trials
  10. - Highlighted possible outcomes including potential recall by NHTSA

FAQ

What triggered the investigation?

Several crashes involved violations of traffic laws.

How many vehicles are under investigation?

2.88 million Tesla vehicles are included.

What has Tesla's response been?

Tesla did not immediately comment.