The US opens an investigation into Tesla after multiple incidents involving its Full Self-Driving technology, raising safety concerns. The probe covers nearly all Tesla vehicles equipped with the system.
58 incidents under investigation
Vehicles ran red lights
Accidents led to injuries and crashes
Recent stock decline of 0.7%
Musk’s driverless taxi plans at risk
Pressure due to declining car sales
New FSD features introduced
Federal regulators are investigating Tesla’s self-driving feature after numerous incidents of cars running red lights and driving incorrectly, resulting in crashes and injuries.
US begins investigation into Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Technology
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched a new investigation into Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system following 58 reported incidents where vehicles using the technology ran red lights, drove on the wrong side of the road, crashed, caused fires, and resulted in 23 injuries. This probe covers approximately 2.9 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD, including versions labeled as “FSD (Supervised)” and “FSD (Beta)”.[1][2][3]
Scope and Details of the Investigation
The investigation examines whether Tesla’s FSD software provides drivers with adequate warnings about unexpected vehicle behavior, focusing on the system’s ability to detect and respond to traffic signals, lane markings, and wrong-way signs.
Many Tesla drivers reported receiving no alerts before the vehicles committed traffic violations or crashes.
The investigation evaluates if drivers have sufficient time to react and safely oversee the automated driving tasks.[3][4][5]
Background and Previous Probes
Tesla’s FSD system is a Level 2 driver-assistance technology, requiring drivers to stay fully attentive and ready to take control at all times.
NHTSA has been investigating Tesla’s driver-assistance systems for years due to multiple crashes, including a fatal 2024 motorcycle crash in Seattle involving FSD.
Earlier inquiries covered Tesla’s summon feature and crashes in fog and low visibility affecting 2.4 million vehicles.
There are ongoing concerns about Tesla’s crash reporting compliance to federal regulations.[6][7][1]
Legal and Market Impact
In August 2025, a Miami jury found Tesla partially liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving Autopilot technology, distinct from FSD, ordering Tesla to pay $243 million in damages. Tesla plans to appeal this verdict.[2][8]
Analysts and investors criticize Tesla’s reliance on cameras alone for FSD, urging the addition of radar hardware to improve safety.
Tesla recently released an upgraded FSD version, incorporating data from its pilot robotaxi program, but the system still requires active driver supervision.[9][5][10]
Tesla’s Business Challenges
Tesla’s vehicle sales face pressures from boycotts due to CEO Elon Musk’s political stances and stiff competition from cheaper, high-quality Chinese EV makers like BYD.
Tesla announced cheaper, stripped-down versions of existing models, including the Model Y, to maintain competitiveness, but investor reception was lukewarm, reflected in stock price declines.[4][1]
The latest NHTSA probe into nearly 3 million Tesla vehicles intensifies scrutiny on the safety and reliability of the Full Self-Driving system amid rising complaints and crashes. While Tesla emphasizes that FSD is supervised and not fully autonomous, regulators, investors, and safety advocates question its readiness and transparency. Tesla’s legal challenges, market pressures, and this expanding federal investigation collectively highlight significant hurdles for Elon Musk’s vision of fully driverless Tesla vehicles.[5][7][8][11][1][2]
Rachel Patel is a senior news editor and journalist specializing in political journalism and digital media. With over seven years of professional experience, she is recognized for her accuracy, source verification, and audience-focused reporting approach.
Rachel earned her M.S. in Journalism & Media Studies from Stanford University (2018), where she developed expertise in media ethics, political communication, and digital storytelling.
Her career has centered on bridging traditional political reporting with the fast-paced world of online journalism. She has contributed to major global media outlets, analyzing how digital platforms — from YouTube and Reddit to TikTok and Bluesky — shape political narratives, influence public opinion, and redefine news consumption.
Now based in Berlin, Germany, Rachel serves as a Senior News Editor at Faharas NET, leading coverage on digital politics, media literacy, and social communication trends in the modern information landscape.
apnews is the official website for the Associated Press (AP), a non-profit news cooperative that provides news content and services to other media organizations worldwide.
The website features breaking news, headlines, and videos across all categories, including politics, business, entertainment, and sports, along with in-depth articles and other resources.
Elena Voren is a senior journalist and Tech Section Editor with 8 years of experience focusing on AI ethics, social media impact, and consumer software. She is recognized for interviewing industry leaders and academic experts while clearly distinguishing opinion from evidence-based reporting.
She earned her B.A. in Cognitive Science from the University of California, Berkeley (2016), where she studied human-computer interaction, AI, and digital behavior.
Elena’s work emphasizes the societal implications of technology, ensuring readers understand both the practical and ethical dimensions of emerging tools. She leads the Tech Section at Faharas NET, supervising coverage on AI, consumer software, digital society, and privacy technologies, while maintaining rigorous editorial standards.
Based in Berlin, Germany, Elena provides insightful analyses on technology trends, ethical AI deployment, and the influence of social platforms on modern life.
