Last week, as the Trump administration faced controversy over military strikes near Venezuela, a Department of Homeland Security employee posted a video on X. This video showed ICE officials arresting individuals, framing the actions as patriotic, using a lyric from Sabrina Carpenter’s song “Juno.”
Pop Stars Respond to Administration’s Actions
Sabrina Carpenter, a prominent pop star, found herself in a difficult position. If she remained silent like Taylor Swift did previously, it could seem like she supported the administration’s use of her art. However, speaking out might draw further attention to their harmful propaganda.
Carpenter chose to respond, calling the video “evil and disgusting” and rejecting the administration’s agenda. While many appreciated her stance, it inadvertently increased views of the original video and publicity for the ICE propaganda. The White House also dismissed her comments, continuing to defend their actions against immigrants.
Pattern of Exploiting Pop Music
Many artists, including Olivia Rodrigo and SZA, have opposed the administration’s use of their music. SZA noted that the exploitation was “evil and boring,” highlighting a troubling pattern of how the administration engages with artists.
This administration often operates like a media influencer, prioritizing engagement over substance. In response to media inquiries, a White House official acknowledged their strategy to use artists for promotion, proving they aren’t casual about these actions.
Future Responses from Artists
For musicians, the situation remains challenging. Still, young artists with engaged fanbases, like Carpenter, can effectively address fear, racism, and violence the administration normalizes.
Some artists, like Zach Bryan, take a stronger stand against ICE, challenging the government instead of reacting to their provocation. Recognition of the administration’s gamesmanship may help artists navigate this complex environment better.
