Pebble, now Core Devices, introduces the Index 01, a unique ring priced at $75. Unlike traditional smart rings, it focuses solely on recording voice notes, aiming for simplicity and long battery life.
New voice recording ring launched
Price starts at $75, rises to $99
Designed for easy single-handed use
Records notes without recharging for two years
Utilizes a hearing aid battery
Offers reliable one-button operation
Pebble’s revival is all about simplicity. The Index 01 aims to offer a straightforward way to capture voice notes without the fuss of typical smart rings that track health metrics and require regular recharging. But here’s the catch—it only does one thing, and it’s designed to do that brilliantly.
Focus on simplicity and function
The Index 01 features a Bluetooth radio, a microphone, and a single button—the formula for capturing voice notes easily. You press the button, talk, and release it when done. It’s simple and effective, which sets it apart from its more complicated rivals.
While smart rings often need a charge every few days, this ring is different. It’s built for the long haul, with an integrated battery that can last for a whopping 12–14 hours of recording time. If you average 10 to 20 short notes each day, that translates to about two years of use before the battery needs recycling.
Price and usability specifics
The initial preorder price is just $75, a steal compared to its competitors. Once the preorder period ends, the price bumps up to $99, which is still fairly reasonable for a dedicated voice recorder.
Utilizing a hearing aid battery means no charging fuss during your daily routines. You wear it comfortably on your index finger, making it easy to use with just your thumb.
Durability and recycling process
When the battery finally gives out, you don’t toss the ring in a landfill. Pebble encourages recycling, promoting eco-friendliness alongside innovation.
Luca Fischer is a senior technology journalist with more than twelve years of professional experience specializing in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and consumer electronics. L. Fischer earned his M.S. in Computer Science from Columbia University in 2011, where he developed a strong foundation in data science and network security before transitioning into tech media.
Throughout his career, Luca has been recognized for his clear, analytical approach to explaining complex technologies. His in-depth articles explore how AI innovations, privacy frameworks, and next-generation devices impact both industry and society.
Luca’s work has appeared across leading digital publications, where he delivers detailed reviews, investigative reports, and feature analyses on major players such as Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD, Intel, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity AI.
Beyond writing, he mentors young journalists entering the AI-tech field and advocates for transparent, ethical technology communication. His goal is to make the future of technology understandable and responsible for everyone.
Ars Technica was launched in 1998 by Ken Fisher and Jon Stokes as a space where engineers, coders, and hard-core enthusiasts could find news that respected their intelligence.
From the start it rejected shallow churn, instead publishing 5 000-word CPU micro-architecture briefs, line-by-line Linux kernel diffs, and forensic GPU teardowns that treat readers like fellow engineers rather than casual shoppers.
Condé Nast acquired the site in 2008, yet the newsroom retained its autonomy, keeping the beige-and-black design ethos and the Latin tagline “Art of Technology.”
Today its staff physicists, former network architects, and defunct-astronaut hopefuls explain quantum supremacy papers, dissect U.S. spectrum auctions, benchmark every new console, and still find time to live-blog Supreme Court tech policy arguments.
The result is a community whose comment threads read like peer-review sessions: voltage curves are debated, errata are crowdsourced overnight, and authors routinely append “Update” paragraphs that credit readers for spotting a mis-stated opcode.
