Leonardo da Vinci may have developed wood charring methods before Japan's yakisugi, according to recent research. His notes reveal insights on durability that could predate codified Japanese techniques by over a century.
Leonardo’s wood charring discovered earlier
Yakisugi popular in bioarchitecture
Leonardo’s notebooks contain inventions
First manmade plastic possibly created
Heart valve studies predate Harvey
More than 13,000 pages of notes
Leonardo’s exploration into wood charring predates Japan’s yakisugi technique, which protects wooden surfaces by carbonizing them. This method gained traction in the 17th and 18th centuries for its durability against water and pests. However, a research paper suggests that Leonardo discussed these benefits over 100 years earlier.
Leonardo created extensive notebooks, with many pages dedicated to groundbreaking ideas and inventions. These included designs for flying machines and anatomical studies. Fascinatingly, he even hinted at creating telescopes a century before they were realized.
Leonardo’s Charring Technique Explored
Leonardo’s documented wood charring method hints at creating a protective layering that increases wood’s lifespan. This overlaps with the yakisugi practices in Japan, showcasing a diverse understanding of material preservation, despite existing centuries apart.
Leonardo’s notebooks reveal a treasure of innovative concepts. For instance, during a 2003 study, curator Alessandro Vezzosi found mixtures in Leonardo’s notes that produced an ancient form of plastic resembling Bakelite. This points to a potential precursor to synthetic materials.
Relationship with Subsequent Discoveries
Leonardo’s anatomical sketches hold greater significance. His studies on heart valves laid foundations far ahead of their time, uncovering mechanics of blood flow long before William Harvey.
His 150-year leap offers insights into early understandings of human anatomy, influencing later innovations in medical procedures. Here’s a closer look into some key points from his studies:
Heart valve structure detailed
Renaissance inventions shaped future tech
Inventions sometimes precede written record
Broader Implications of His Work
Leonardo’s charring technique and other inventions highlight a profound understanding of materials and biology well ahead of the Renaissance period. His insights challenge the notion of timelines in technological advancement.
Luca Fischer is a senior technology journalist with more than twelve years of professional experience specializing in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and consumer electronics. L. Fischer earned his M.S. in Computer Science from Columbia University in 2011, where he developed a strong foundation in data science and network security before transitioning into tech media.
Throughout his career, Luca has been recognized for his clear, analytical approach to explaining complex technologies. His in-depth articles explore how AI innovations, privacy frameworks, and next-generation devices impact both industry and society.
Luca’s work has appeared across leading digital publications, where he delivers detailed reviews, investigative reports, and feature analyses on major players such as Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD, Intel, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity AI.
Beyond writing, he mentors young journalists entering the AI-tech field and advocates for transparent, ethical technology communication. His goal is to make the future of technology understandable and responsible for everyone.
Ars Technica was launched in 1998 by Ken Fisher and Jon Stokes as a space where engineers, coders, and hard-core enthusiasts could find news that respected their intelligence.
From the start it rejected shallow churn, instead publishing 5 000-word CPU micro-architecture briefs, line-by-line Linux kernel diffs, and forensic GPU teardowns that treat readers like fellow engineers rather than casual shoppers.
Condé Nast acquired the site in 2008, yet the newsroom retained its autonomy, keeping the beige-and-black design ethos and the Latin tagline “Art of Technology.”
Today its staff physicists, former network architects, and defunct-astronaut hopefuls explain quantum supremacy papers, dissect U.S. spectrum auctions, benchmark every new console, and still find time to live-blog Supreme Court tech policy arguments.
The result is a community whose comment threads read like peer-review sessions: voltage curves are debated, errata are crowdsourced overnight, and authors routinely append “Update” paragraphs that credit readers for spotting a mis-stated opcode.
