Not Checked
Lee Greenwood makes his case to replace Bad Bunny
US

Lee Greenwood argues for his replacement of Bad Bunny

Lee Greenwood wants to replace Bad Bunny

Lee Greenwood is advocating to perform at Super Bowl LX instead of Bad Bunny, amid controversy surrounding the decision.

  • Bad Bunny tapped for Super Bowl LX
  • Political figures criticize his selection
  • Greenwood expresses interest in replacing him
  • Calls for performance of "God Bless the U.S.A."
  • Alternative halftime shows may emerge
  • Past incidents suggest audience splits

The NFL’s choice of Bad Bunny for the Super Bowl LX halftime show has generated significant backlash. This decision has led to discussions about having ICE agents at the game due to misconceptions about ticket buyers.

Background of Controversy

The NFL’s decision to select Puerto Rican-born, U.S. citizen Bad Bunny as the headliner for the 2026 Super Bowl LX halftime show sparked significant political backlash. Critics argue that Bad Bunny’s style and politics do not appeal to a broad Super Bowl audience. Some opposition focuses on his comments on U.S. immigration policies, despite his citizenship.[1][2]

Political Reactions

  • President Donald Trump publicly questioned Bad Bunny’s identity and suitability for the halftime performance, calling it “crazy” and “absurd”.[1]
  • House Speaker Mike Johnson criticized the choice as a “terrible decision” and proposed Lee Greenwood as a better alternative, citing the need for positive role models for the wide and young Super Bowl audience.[3][4]

Lee Greenwood’s Response

Country music legend Lee Greenwood responded affirmatively to Johnson’s suggestion. He expressed confidence in his ability to deliver a compelling performance, noting his history performing at NFL events, especially military Salute to Service games. Greenwood also proposed singing “God Bless the U.S.A.” before the game to unify the crowd.[4][5][3]

Alternative Halftime Programming Possibilities

In response to the controversy, conservative groups like Turning Point USA announced plans for a rival halftime show promoting “faith, family, and freedom” as an alternative to Bad Bunny’s performance. This aligns with historical instances where networks have provided alternative Super Bowl halftime entertainment, such as Fox’s successful In Living Color special in 1992, which drew millions away from the broadcast and led to the NFL revamping its halftime shows.[6][7][8][9]

Historical Context of Halftime Shows

Prior to the 1990s, Super Bowl halftimes mainly featured themed marching bands and wholesome performances. The 1992 alternative programming success led the NFL to invite major pop stars from 1993 onward to boost halftime ratings, beginning with Michael Jackson.[10][6]

Editorial Timeline

Revisions
— by Kamar Mahmoud
Added new relevant secondary sources
— by Kamar Mahmoud
Initial publication.

Correction Record

Accountability
— by Kamar Mahmoud
  1. - Clarified Bad Bunny's U.S. citizenship and background.
  2. - Added direct quotes from President Trump and Mike Johnson.
  3. - Included Lee Greenwood's exact stance and performance proposal.
  4. - Cited Turning Point USA’s alternative halftime show plans.
  5. - Provided historical context with 1992 Fox counterprogramming example.
  6. - Highlighted political and cultural tensions explicitly.
  7. - Shortened paragraphs for clearer, direct presentation.
  8. - Incorporated verified dates and event details.
  9. - Referenced Bad Bunny’s reaction to criticism.
  10. - Balanced controversy with positive fan and artist perspectives.

FAQ

Why is Bad Bunny receiving criticism?

Critics argue he lacks broad appeal for young audiences.

How does Greenwood plan to get the spot?

He publicly expressed interest in performing.

What was a historical precedent for alternative shows?

Fox's In Living Color aired during Super Bowl XXVI.