Completed
U.S. and Chinese flags with text "U.S. counters China restrictions" highlighting rare earth trade war.
UPDATED True GLB

How the United States Can Counter China’s Rare-Earth Export Controls

Trump's Strategy to Counter China's Rare Earths Moves

Trump aims to retaliate against China's rare earth export restrictions, potentially using U.S. economic power and tariffs as leverage in trade discussions.

  • Trade tension between U.S. and China
  • Trump proposes new tariffs and restrictions
  • China's rare earth policy may backfire
  • U.S. holds strong positions in technology
  • Expansion of export controls possible
  • Coordinated trade actions with allies
  • Mexico's proposed tariffs on Chinese products
  • Potential for deeper U.S.-China decoupling

The United States can preserve negotiating strength and secure critical supply chains by deploying targeted measures in technology, finance, and allied coordination.

China’s Latest Export Controls

On October 9, 2025, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued Announcement No. 62, expanding export controls to rare-earth elements, permanent magnets, production equipment, and related technologies. Exports require government approval if products contain 0.1 percent or more by value of Chinese-origin rare earths or rely on Chinese extraction, refining, or magnet-making processes. Controls on technology items took effect immediately, with full extraterritorial enforcement from December 1, 2025.[1][2]

China processes over 90 percent of global rare-earth oxides and magnets, granting it substantial leverage over civilian and defense industries. Although narrower than feared, the new rules cover 17 elements, specialized machinery, and upstream technologies.[3][4][5][6]

U.S. Response Options

The United States can deploy several levers to counterbalance Beijing’s restrictions:

MeasureDescriptionCitations
Technology Export RestrictionsBlock exports of jet engines, avionics, and semiconductor equipment to slow aerospace and electronics industries.[7][3]
Software and OS LicensesSuspend Microsoft Windows licenses and updates in China to create systemic security gaps.[8][9]
Financial SanctionsFreeze dollar-denominated assets and restrict SWIFT access for Chinese firms.[10][11]
Allied Tariff CoordinationEncourage partners (e.g., Mexico’s proposed 50 percent duties) to impose parallel tariffs.[12][13]
Supply-Chain Diversification FundingSupport mining and refining projects in Australia and the U.S. via public-private investments.[14][15]

Technology Supply-Chain Controls

The U.S. leads in commercial aviation components and chip-design software. Western firms hold over 70 percent of China’s chip-design software market. Cutting access would force China toward slower domestic alternatives. Further tightening of lithography and etching tool exports would hamper advanced semiconductor production.[7][16]

Software and Operating Systems

Approximately 90 percent of Chinese PCs run Microsoft Windows. Suspending licenses or critical updates would expose networks to security threats and operational disruptions.[9][17][8]

Financial Sanctions and Allied Action

Freezing yuan-denominated or dollar-denominated assets of key Chinese firms and blocking access to SWIFT would raise financing costs and complicate transactions. Coordinated tariffs among U.S. allies prevent China from diverting exports to alternative markets. Mexico paused deliberations on 1,500-product tariffs pending consultations, illustrating allied alignment potential.[12][13][10][11]

Encouraging Supply-Chain Diversification

Investments under the U.S. Defense Production Act and Australia’s $1.2 billion Critical Minerals Facility can expand mining, processing, and magnet manufacturing outside China. Australia’s rare-earth sector is projected to grow at a 12.2 percent CAGR through 2033, driven by government incentives.[14][18]

Strategic Implications

Capital Economics notes China’s rare-earth gamble may backfire by spurring global diversification away from Chinese sources. Overly aggressive U.S. measures risk accelerating decoupling and dampening growth. The upcoming APEC summit in Gyeongju, where Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping will meet, offers a chance for negotiated de-escalation or a new framework for trade relations.[19][20][21][6][22]

Rachel Patel

Rachel Patel

News Reporter

US Business

Rachel Patel is a senior news editor and journalist specializing in political journalism and digital media. With over seven years of professional experience, she is recognized for her accuracy, source verification, and audience-focused reporting approach.Rachel earned her M.S. in Journalism & Media Studies from Stanford University (2018), where she developed expertise in media ethics, political communication, and digital storytelling.Her career has centered on bridging traditional political reporting with the fast-paced world of online journalism. She has contributed to major global media outlets, analyzing how digital platforms — from YouTube and Reddit to TikTok and Bluesky — shape political narratives, influence public opinion, and redefine news consumption.Now based in Berlin, Germany, Rachel serves as a Senior News Editor at Faharas NET, leading coverage on digital politics, media literacy, and social communication trends in the modern information landscape.

86
Articles
935
Views
23
Shares
Fortune

Fortune

Primary Source

No coverage areas yet

Fortune.com is the website for Fortune, a global business magazine known for its in-depth reporting and rankings like the Fortune 500 and Global 500 lists. It provides business news, analysis, and digital content, including newsletters and long-form articles, catering to business leaders and professionals worldwide.

18
Articles
166
Views
0
Shares
Howayda Sayed

Howayda Sayed

Fact-Checking

Business Entertainment Sports News Tech

Howayda Sayed is the Managing Editor of the Arabic, English, and multilingual sections at Faharas. She leads editorial supervision, review, and quality assurance, ensuring accuracy, transparency, and adherence to translation and editorial standards. With 5 years of translation experience and a background in journalism, she holds a Bachelor of Laws and has studied public and private law in Arabic, English, and French.

0
Articles
0
Views
0
Shares
136
Reviews

Editorial Timeline

Revisions
— by Howayda Sayed
Enhanced precision, structure, and factual transparency.
— by Howayda Sayed
Removed hype, clichés, and nonstandard symbols.
— by Howayda Sayed
Applied tables and lists to improve scan-ability.
— by Howayda Sayed
Organized sections by policy, response, impact, and advice.
— by Howayda Sayed
Verified claims with MOFCOM, Reuters, and reports.
— by Howayda Sayed
Updated data, dates, and policy figures accurately.
— by Howayda Sayed
Linked all facts to authoritative, recent sources.
— by Howayda Sayed
Added a concise table for U.S. response options.
— by Howayda Sayed
Rewrote title and subheadings for clarity and flow.
— by Howayda Sayed
Initial publication.

Correction Record

Accountability
— by Howayda Sayed
  1. Confirm the full text and scope of Announcement No. 62 in the official MOFCOM notice.
  2. Update China’s 90 percent processing share with the latest UN Comtrade and USGS data.
  3. Track Microsoft’s formal policy on Windows support suspension in China.
  4. Monitor U.S. Treasury and OFAC for sanctions announcements affecting SWIFT access.
  5. Follow Mexico’s congressional action on proposed 50 percent tariffs and allied tariff developments.
  6. Review capital-economics.com and related reports for evolving analysis on rare-earth diversification.
  7. Incorporate data from UN Comtrade, USGS, and industry trade groups for production and trade volume statistics.
  8. Watch for Australia-US critical minerals partnership announcements adding funding or offtake guarantees.
  9. Cite and contextualize any new export-control notices or revisions by MOFCOM.
  10. Verify allied coordination statements from G7, EU, Japan, and South Korea regarding China trade policy.

FAQ

What motivated China’s rare earths restrictions?

China aims to strengthen its negotiating position with the U.S.

What retaliatory actions can the U.S. take?

Potential actions include tariffs, export controls, and financial sanctions.

How might this affect global trade?

There is a risk of deeper economic decoupling between the U.S. and China.