Completed
Legal document showing Pras Michel prison sentence for illegal campaign donations with gavel
UPDATED Selective US

Pras Michel Sentenced to 14 Years in Prison for Illegal Foreign Campaign Donations and Lobbying

Pras Michel sentenced to 14 years for campaign violations

Pras Michel, a rapper from the Fugees, received a 14-year prison sentence for illegally funneling foreign donations to Barack Obama's 2012 campaign. He plans to appeal the conviction.

  • Pras Michel sentenced to 14 years
  • Convicted of illegal donations
  • Involvement with foreign billionaire
  • Defense calls sentence excessive
  • Michel plans to appeal
  • Trial included high-profile testimony

Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, founding member of Grammy-winning hip-hop group The Fugees, was sentenced to 14 years in federal prison on November 20, 2025, for orchestrating schemes to funnel illegal foreign campaign donations into Barack Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign and for lobbying Trump administration officials on behalf of foreign interests. U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly imposed the sentence in Washington, D.C. after Michel was convicted in April 2023 on 10 federal counts including conspiracy, money laundering, and acting as an unregistered foreign agent for China. Michel must surrender January 27, 2026, serve three years probation following release, and forfeit $64-65 million.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

The Criminal Conspiracy Behind Illegal Foreign Campaign Donations

Michel orchestrated separate criminal schemes across two presidential administrations involving Malaysian billionaire Low Taek Jho and Republican lobbyist Elliott Broidy to conceal illegal foreign campaign donations and influence U.S. government decisions. Between 2012 and 2017, Michel obtained over $120 million from Low and directed funds through illicit channels to corrupt the American political process. Low Taek Jho is accused of stealing approximately $4.5 billion from Malaysia’s 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) state fund, with Michel channeling portions of these stolen funds.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][1]

The Obama Campaign Contribution Scheme with Foreign Funds

Michel funneled nearly $2 million in illegal foreign campaign donations to an Obama super PAC between June and November 2012 using straw donors to conceal the money’s true source from campaign finance regulators. During trial testimony, Michel admitted he viewed Low’s payments as “free money” and accepted millions specifically to help Low secure a photograph with President Obama.[3][5][6][9][1][2]

The Trump Administration Lobbying Operation and Foreign Influence

After 2017, Michel and Broidy lobbied the Justice Department to drop investigations into Low and advocated for extradition of Chinese dissident Guo Wengui to China in exchange for payment. Low funded both men’s lobbying efforts to advance his personal interests and Beijing’s diplomatic demands.[4][6][9][2][3]

Trial Evidence and Key Witness Testimony

The trial featured three high-profile witnesses establishing connections to illegal foreign funding:[6][7][9][1][2][3]

  • Leonardo DiCaprio – Connected Low through financing “The Wolf of Wall Street” film and Hollywood investments[11][12][9][2][3]
  • Jeff Sessions – Former Attorney General establishing conspiracy details and foreign agent activity[7][9][3][6]
  • Steve Wynn – Casino magnate corroborating illegal foreign funding connections and scheme details[2][6]

DiCaprio’s testimony proved crucial, connecting Low to illicit financial schemes and demonstrating his capacity for global influence operations through Hollywood projects and entertainment industry payments. Low used portions of allegedly stolen 1MDB funds to finance Hollywood films including “The Wolf of Wall Street” and to maintain lavish international networks with celebrities.[12][9][11][3][6][2]

Federal Charges and Sentencing Findings

Michel was convicted of 10 federal counts related to the illegal foreign campaign donations and lobbying schemes:[5][8][9][1][3][6][7][2]

  1. Conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws[9][5][2]
  2. Acting as unregistered foreign agent for China[4][6][2]
  3. Money laundering and financial fraud[5][7][9][2]
  4. Witness tampering and obstruction of justice[7][2][5]
  5. Perjury during trial testimony[6][9]

Judge Kollar-Kotelly characterized Michel as “well educated but very arrogant” and noted his complete lack of remorse, stating he was “dishonest in some answers” during proceedings. Prosecutors emphasized that Michel “betrayed his country for money” and “lied unapologetically and unrelentingly” to carry out his schemes.[13][1][3][2][5][6][7]

Defense Arguments and Michel’s Appeal Plans

Defense attorney Peter Zeidenberg argued the sentence was “completely disproportionate to the offense,” seeking only three years imprisonment for the illegal foreign campaign donations violations. Zeidenberg contended life sentences are reserved for deadly terrorists and drug kingpins, not campaign finance violators. Michel intends to appeal both his conviction and sentence. Michel had rejected a plea deal that would have required only 16 months in prison in exchange for admitting obstruction of justice.[1][3][9][2][5][6][7]

Background on Key Figures and Global Connections

Michel, 52, born in Brooklyn to Haitian immigrants, co-founded The Fugees with Lauryn Hill and Wyclef Jean in the 1990s and achieved Grammy recognition for their work. The group won two Grammy Awards in 1997 for “The Score” album and sold tens of millions of albums globally.[14][15][9][5][7]

Low Taek Jho remains a fugitive in China, accused of embezzling billions from Malaysia’s 1Malaysia Development Berhad fund and using stolen money for political operations and Hollywood investments. He financed Hollywood projects including “The Wolf of Wall Street” and maintained global influence networks used for lobbying and illegal campaign donation schemes. Low is described as operating in partnership with former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak in orchestrating the 1MDB scheme.[8][11][12][9][1][2][4][6]

Guo Wengui, the Chinese dissident targeted for extradition through the illegal lobbying efforts, was arrested in the U.S., tried, and convicted in separate fraud charges but remains unsentenced. Michel and Broidy accepted payment from Low specifically to lobby the Trump administration on behalf of China to facilitate Guo’s extradition.[9][2][4][6]

Sophia Clarke

Sophia Clarke

Senior International Journalist

United Kingdom – London Entertainment

Sophia Clarke is a senior international journalist with nine years of experience covering global politics, human rights, and international diplomacy. She earned her M.A. in International Relations and Journalism from the University of Oxford (2016), where she specialized in global governance, conflict reporting, and cross-cultural communication. Sophia began her career as a foreign correspondent for BBC World Service and later joined The Guardian, where her insightful analyses and on-the-ground reporting from Europe, the Middle East, and Latin America earned her recognition for accuracy and integrity. Now based in Paris, France, Sophia contributes to Faharas NET, providing comprehensive coverage of diplomatic affairs, humanitarian issues, and policy developments shaping the international landscape. Her storytelling combines investigative depth, journalistic ethics, and a strong commitment to amplifying underrepresented voices in global dialogue.

148
Articles
1.8K
Views
9
Shares
Theguardian

Theguardian

Primary Source

No coverage areas yet

Theguardian.com is the digital heartbeat of a 204-year-old newspaper that refuses to erect a paywall. Since migrating online in 1999, the site has grown into a 24-hour global newsroom serving 25 million unique browsers each day, with two-thirds of that traffic originating outside the United Kingdom. From a converted cotton mill in Kings Cross, 600 journalists file in English, Arabic and Hindi, while satellite bureaus in Sydney, Hong Kong, Washington, Lagos and Mexico City ensure the sun never sets on Guardian coverage. Investigative rigour remains the calling card. The 2013 Edward Snowden revelations, published in partnership with the Washington Post, exposed the NSA’s bulk-data dragnet and earned the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. More recently, the “Pegasus Project” consortium led by Guardian editors uncovered how military-grade spyware sold to 40 governments targeted journalists, human-rights lawyers and even heads of state; the series triggered parliamentary inquiries on four continents and export-license suspensions in Israel and Spain. Every leak undergoes a three-layer verification process: technical forensic analysis, legal consultation under UK defamation law, and an internal “sensitivity board” that weighs public interest against personal harm. The newsroom’s centre-left stance is declared in an editorial code posted on every page, yet opinion and reportage are physically separated. Columnists such as Owen Jones and Polly Toynbee argue for progressive taxation and climate action on dedicated “Comment is Free” pages, while breaking-news live-blogs use neutral phrasing and link to primary documents court filings, scientific papers, leaked spreadsheets so readers can audit sourcing in real time. This transparency ethos extends to corrections: errors are struck through in red at the top of articles, accompanied by a timestamp and editor’s note explaining what changed and why. Funding comes from readers, not advertisers. After watching digital ad rates plummet 40 % between 2016 and 2018, Guardian Media Group pivoted to a voluntary membership model. Supporters can contribute £5 a month or make one-time gifts; in return they receive fewer on-site appeals and access to the “Guardian Extra” newsletter that discloses upcoming investigations. By 2023 reader revenue exceeded £50 million annually, covering 55 % of editorial costs and insulating coverage from corporate pressure. No shareholder dividends are paid; profits are reinvested into climate, inequality and human-rights reporting. Sport, culture and lifestyle verticals attract younger audiences who may arrive for a Champions League match tracker and stay for long-reads on refugee policy. The “Football Weekly” podcast averages 1.2 million downloads per episode, while interactive guides such as “How to read the IPCC report in five charts” distill complex science into shareable visuals. Whether chronicling COP negotiations, live-blogging royal funerals or explaining why lettuce prices tripled overnight, theguardian.com delivers open-access journalism Platform financed by citizens who believe factual, fearless reporting is a public good worth paying for.

27
Articles
271
Views
0
Shares
Michael Brown

Michael Brown

Senior Editor

Artificial Intelligence Business Entertainment Sports News

Mr. Michael Brown is an IoT architect based in Austin, Texas, USA, specializing in IoT systems, sensor networks, and IoT security. He earned his Ph.D. in Internet of Things from the University of Texas in 2017 and has seven years of professional experience designing and implementing IoT architectures. At FaharasNET, Michael leads projects on IoT system integration, sensor network optimization, and device management, while contributing to research publications in the IoT field. His work focuses on creating secure, efficient, and scalable IoT solutions.

0
Articles
0
Views
0
Shares
150
Updates
Howayda Sayed

Howayda Sayed

Fact-Checking

Artificial Intelligence Business Entertainment Sports News

Howayda Sayed is the Managing Editor of the Arabic, English, and multilingual sections at Faharas. She leads editorial supervision, review, and quality assurance, ensuring accuracy, transparency, and adherence to translation and editorial standards. With 5 years of translation experience and a background in journalism, she holds a Bachelor of Laws and has studied public and private law in Arabic, English, and French.

1
Article
14
Views
2
Shares
268
Reviews

Editorial Timeline

Revisions
— by Howayda Sayed
Uploaded the featured image.
— by Michael Brown
  1. Updated headline for clarity and SEO optimization.
  2. Verified all legal claims using 14+ sources.
  3. Named all witnesses and co-conspirators explicitly.
  4. Separated two schemes into distinct explanatory sections.
  5. Added detailed China extradition plot context.
  6. Included complete penalties and surrender date information.
  7. Created timeline and tables for visual clarity.
  8. Added direct quotes from the presiding judge.
  9. Improved readability with short paragraphs and bullets.
  10. Increased transparency through explicit citation coverage.
  11. Optimized keywords and meta descriptions for SEO.
  12. Structured article for publication-ready professional standards.
— by Michael Brown
Initial publication.

Correction Record

Accountability
— by Michael Brown
  1. Added "sentenced" word; original article omitted critical verb throughout entire text.
  2. Integrated "illegal" descriptor; original failed to emphasize unlawful nature repeatedly.
  3. Inserted "donations" terminology; original used vague "contributions" instead properly.
  4. Added Steve Wynn as third witness; original completely omitted casino magnate from coverage.
  5. Clarified two distinct schemes; original conflated Obama and Trump operations into narrative.
  6. Explained China extradition plot with Guo Wengui; original barely mentioned charges.
  7. Distinguished funding amounts: $120 million total versus $2 million campaign donations.
  8. Added Elliott Broidy's role as co-conspirator; original excluded Republican fundraiser involvement.
  9. Included forfeiture and probation terms; original omitted $64 million forfeiture requirements entirely.
  10. Specified surrender date January 27, 2026; original lacked precise incarceration timeline information.
  11. Added judge's specific characterizations of Michel's arrogance; original presented vague findings.
  12. Explained 1MDB scandal context; original provided minimal background on fund.

FAQ

Why was Pras Michel sentenced to prison?

He was convicted of illegal foreign campaign donations.

What is the amount involved in the case?

More than $120 million from a foreign donor.

What will Michel do next?

He plans to appeal his conviction and sentence.