At Faharas.net, our mission is simple: Global News. Human Checked. Transparent to Trust.
Founded in 2019, we are an independent global news platform dedicated to cutting through the noise of the digital age. In a world saturated with automated content and unverified information, we provide something different: original news summaries curated and verified exclusively by trained human editors.
Our work is built on three core principles:
- Human-Centric Journalism: Every story we publish is researched, written, and edited by people. While we use technology for technical support, no algorithm writes our content or makes editorial decisions. We believe the nuance, context, and judgment of human professionals are essential for trustworthy journalism.
- Uncompromising Independence: We operate without corporate ownership, central advertisements, or paywalls. This structure ensures our editorial judgment is never influenced by commercial interests, political pressures, or the need to generate clicks. Our only allegiance is to the truth and to our readers.
- Radical Transparency: Trust is not given; it is earned. We believe in being open about our processes and accountable for our work. Every article includes clear source attribution, a visible verification status, and a public log of any corrections. We invite our readers to see exactly how we arrive at our conclusions.
This Editorial Policy serves as a public blueprint of our commitment. It details the rigorous standards, multi-stage verification workflows, and ethical guidelines that govern every piece of content we publish. By reading it, you will understand the principles we uphold to ensure the information we provide is accurate, fair, and reliable.
1. Editorial Mission
Faharas.net stands as an independent editorial platform committed to the principles of accurate, transparent, and accessible journalism. Our core mission is to publish verified, human-edited summaries of news and analysis that readers can confidently trust.
Since our establishment on September 14, 2019, we have operated under the guiding principle: “Global News. Human Checked. Transparent to Trust.” Every article undergoes a meticulous human-led editorial workflow built on three pillars: clarity, factual accuracy, and fairness. We maintain strict standards against publishing speculation, rumors, or unattributed claims, ensuring our readers receive only verified information.
Our team monitors over 500 trusted global sources, covering developments in 195 countries while maintaining a 96% accuracy rate through rigorous verification processes. We believe that quality journalism requires human intelligence, judgment, and ethical oversight at every stage of content creation.
2. Editorial Independence
Faharas.net operates as a volunteer-driven, community-based network rather than a corporate newsroom. This structural distinction is fundamental to our editorial independence:
- Organizational Structure: We maintain complete independence from corporate ownership, external shareholders, and centralized control.
- Funding Model: We do not accept corporate funding, grants, sponsorships, paid placements, or political contributions that could compromise our editorial integrity.
- Editorial Authority: All editorial decisions are made exclusively by our team of human editors and contributors, free from commercial or external influence.
- Monetization Approach: While contributors may connect their personal ad accounts for individual article monetization, Faharas.net operates with a zero-commission structure. We do not process financial transactions or participate in advertising agreements, ensuring our editorial decisions remain untainted by financial considerations.
This commitment to independence allows us to maintain public trust while providing high-quality journalism without paywalls, corporate advertising, or hidden agendas. Our transparent approach ensures readers can access information without barriers while understanding exactly how our platform operates.
3. Editorial Workflow
Every piece of content published on Faharas.net undergoes a rigorous, multi-stage verification process designed to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and integrity. This structured workflow places human editorial judgment at its core, using technology only as a supportive tool. Our process is transparent, methodical, and accountable at every step.
Our Six-Stage Verification Process:
- Automated Ingest: We begin by systematically collecting headlines and content from a global network of over 500 trusted sources via RSS feeds, public APIs, and licensed crawlers. All incoming material is time-stamped to establish a clear chain of custody.
- AI Triage: Artificial intelligence serves a purely technical function in this phase, identifying duplicate stories and flagging potential inconsistencies in data, such as dates or figures. It is critical to note that AI does not write, edit, or make any editorial decisions. Its role is limited to streamlining the workflow for our human editors.
- Primary Verification: An assigned editor conducts a thorough investigation, rigorously cross-referencing the material against official documents, direct statements, and a minimum of two other reliable sources. This initial human review is the foundation of our fact-checking process.
- Secondary Review: A second, independent editor then conducts a separate verification. This crucial step involves challenging or confirming the primary findings, ensuring all claims are substantiated, and validating the overall consistency and accuracy of the content before it proceeds.
- Classification: Upon successful verification, a final accuracy label is applied to the article. This verdict—ranging from “True” and “False” to “Misleading,” “Selective,” or “Exaggerated”—provides readers with an at-a-glance assessment of the content’s factual nature.
- Trust Score Update: As a final measure of accountability, the reliability record of the original source is updated within our public system. This continuous feedback loop helps maintain the integrity of our entire source network over time.
This comprehensive workflow ensures that while we leverage technology for efficiency, human editors remain solely responsible and accountable for every step of the publication process.
4. Fact-Checking and Verification
At Faharas.net, fact-checking is not an afterthought; it is the central pillar of our editorial operation. We adhere to a non-negotiable standard that every claim, story, and piece of analysis must be verified before it reaches our readers.
Each article is meticulously reviewed by a minimum of two human editors. Our verification process relies on a hierarchy of evidence, prioritizing official records, direct statements from primary sources, and reports from reputable, independent news organizations. We do not publish rumors, single-source claims, or unattributed information.
To provide complete transparency, every fact-checked report on our platform includes three essential, publicly visible elements:
- A Workflow Status Label: This clearly indicates the article’s current stage in the verification process (e.g., “In Progress,” “Partially Verified,” or “Verified”), allowing readers to understand its status at a glance.
- A Final Verdict: Each published story is assigned a definitive classification that speaks to its factual accuracy. This verdict system—ranging from “True” to “Myth”—provides a clear, standardized evaluation of the content’s trustworthiness.
- A List of Verified Sources: We believe in showing our work. Every article includes direct, functional links to the original source materials used for confirmation, empowering readers to explore the evidence for themselves.
For a detailed understanding of our verification principles and procedures, we invite you to learn more in our FactCheck Guidelines.
5. Accuracy and Corrections
At Faharas.net, we pursue an uncompromising standard of factual accuracy. While our rigorous verification process allows us to maintain a 96% accuracy rate, we acknowledge that errors can occur. When they do, our commitment is to address them with speed, transparency, and accountability.
Any substantive error identified in our content is corrected promptly. All corrections are permanently recorded in the article’s Editorial Update Log, which is publicly accessible. This log ensures that our readers are not only informed of the correct information but are also aware of the correction history.
Each entry in the Editorial Update Log includes:
- The date and time of the update.
- The name or initials of the responsible editor.
- A clear and concise description of the change that was made.
We value our readers as partners in maintaining accuracy. To request a correction or report a potential error, please contact [email protected] or use our dedicated Corrections Form. All reports are reviewed within 24 hours.
6. Editorial Transparency
Trust is built on transparency. We don’t just ask you to trust our process; we show it to you. Every article published on Faharas.net features a standardized set of visible transparency features, collectively known as the Faharas Editorial Transparency Framework.
These elements provide readers with an at-a-glance understanding of an article’s journey and verification status:
- Byline: Clearly identifies the responsible author or editor, establishing direct accountability.
- Workflow Status: Displays the article’s current verification stage (e.g., “In Progress,” “Verified,” “Unverifiable”), so you know its status at a glance.
- Correction Log: Provides a transparent record of any factual or editorial updates made after publication.
- Source List: Offers direct, functional links to all verified references and original source materials used, empowering you to explore the evidence for yourself.
Together, these components ensure that every story on our platform is traceable, verifiable, and accountable.
7. Conflicts of Interest
Maintaining objectivity is a non-negotiable requirement for everyone who contributes to Faharas.net. Our credibility depends on our ability to report and analyze news without any influence from personal, professional, or financial interests.
To uphold this principle, we enforce a strict two-part policy:
- Mandatory Disclosure: Editors and contributors are required to proactively disclose any potential conflict of interest related to a subject they are assigned to cover. This includes personal relationships, financial investments, professional affiliations, or any other interest that could be perceived as a bias. If a potential conflict is identified, the assignment is immediately reassigned to another team member to preserve objectivity.
- Strict Prohibition: Contributors are strictly forbidden from publishing content that promotes their own personal business, political, or affiliate interests. Faharas.net is not a platform for undisclosed advertising or advocacy. Any violation of this policy will result in the removal of the content and may lead to the suspension of the contributor’s privileges.
8. Use of AI and Automation
At Faharas.net, we embrace technology as a powerful assistant, but we draw a firm line at allowing it to make editorial decisions. Artificial intelligence is employed exclusively for technical support functions that enhance the efficiency and accuracy of our human-led workflow.
The role of AI is strictly defined and limited to tasks such as:
- Duplicate Detection: Identifying and merging similar stories from various sources.
- Data Verification: Cross-referencing dates, numerical figures, and other data points for consistency.
- Anomaly Flagging: Alerting human editors to statistical outliers or unusually sensational language for further review.
It is critical to understand what AI does not do at Faharas.net:
- AI does not write, rewrite, or generate any editorial content.
- AI does not make editorial judgments or decisions.
- AI does not assign fact-checking verdicts or assess source credibility.
Every word published on our platform is conceived, researched, written, verified, and approved by human editors. Editorial judgment and final authority rest solely with people, ensuring that the nuance, context, and ethical considerations of journalism are never outsourced to a machine.
For a comprehensive understanding of our principles, please see our full AI Policy.
9. Contributor Ethics
Our credibility is built on the unwavering ethical conduct of our contributors. All individuals who create content for Faharas.net must adhere to the Faharas Code of Editorial Ethics, a set of non-negotiable principles that guide our work. This code requires:
- Unwavering Honesty and Radical Transparency: All sources must be clearly and honestly attributed. We do not publish unattributed claims or information from anonymous sources unless it meets strict public interest criteria and is verified.
- Commitment to Factual Accuracy: Every contributor must be dedicated to evidence-based reporting, rigorously verifying claims before publication.
- Zero Tolerance for Plagiarism: All content must be original. Copying from other sources or unverified claims is strictly forbidden.
- Respect for Privacy and Dignity: We are committed to responsible reporting that respects the privacy of individuals and the dignity of all subjects.
Violations of these foundational standards undermine the trust of our readers and the integrity of our platform. Depending on the severity, breaches may result in the immediate removal of content, formal reprimand, or suspension or termination of contributor privileges.
For detailed expectations, please refer to our Contributor Guidelines and Author Guidelines.
10. Editorial Roles and Responsibilities
Clear roles and responsibilities are essential for maintaining our high standards. Our editorial structure is designed to ensure accountability, expertise, and a rigorous review process at every level.
- Founder and Editorial Director: Engr. Audai Mousa provides overarching leadership, defining the editorial structure, upholding platform standards, and overseeing staff training and development.
- Editors: Serving as the primary guardians of factual accuracy, editors verify facts, ensure neutrality, manage updates, and uphold the integrity of the editorial workflow.
- Contributors: Our contributors are the foundation of our content, writing original summaries and verified analysis based on their expertise and regional knowledge.
- Reviewers: Acting as a critical final checkpoint, reviewers check for accuracy, evidence, and full compliance with all editorial policies before content is published.
To ensure transparency, all verified editors and contributors are publicly listed on our Team Page.
11. Public Feedback and Accountability
We view our readers as essential partners in our mission to provide trustworthy news. Faharas.net actively welcomes and encourages reader feedback, correction requests, and inquiries about our policies. Your input helps us maintain accuracy and improve our platform.
To contact us, please use the appropriate channel:
- Corrections: [email protected] | Corrections Form
- Abuse or Policy Violations: [email protected] | Abuse Form
- General Contact: [email protected]
We are committed to responsiveness. All messages are reviewed by an assigned editor, and we strive to provide a substantive response within 48 hours.
12. Updates to this Policy
This Editorial Policy is a living document that reflects our ongoing commitment to best practices in journalism. It may be updated periodically to reflect changes in our standards, advancements in technology, or evolving legal obligations.
Each revision will be marked with a new effective date and will remain publicly available on our website for review at all times. Continued use of Faharas.net after an update indicates your acceptance of the revised policy.
- Effective date: 07 October 2025
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Last updated: 08 October 2025