A federal judge dismissed Drake's defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group regarding Kendrick Lamar's track "Not Like Us," citing the lyrics as hyperbole rather than factual statements.
Drake sued UMG over Lamar's lyrics
Judge ruled lyrics are hyperbole
Drake can appeal the decision
UMG spokesman criticized the lawsuit
Lamar's track topped charts and won awards
Dispute included multiple diss tracks
Judge noted the public feud context
A federal judge in New York dismissed rapper Drake’s defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), on October 9, 2025. The suit centered on Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us,” released in May 2024, which included lyrics accusing Drake of being a “certified pedophile”.[1][2][3]
Court’s Findings Dismisses Drake Lawsuit and Legal Reasoning
Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled the lyrics are “nonactionable opinion,” typical of hyperbolic language used in rap battles, and therefore not defamatory under the law.
She stated that considering the broader context of the heated rap feud, a reasonable listener would not believe the accusations as literal facts.
The decision emphasized that the artistic and contentious nature of diss tracks shields them from defamation claims.
The judge also rejected Drake’s argument that UMG could be liable for promoting the track, finding that republication of a non-defamatory work does not create new liability.[4][5][1]
Background of the Lawsuit
Drake filed the lawsuit in January 2025, accusing UMG of defamation and harassment by distributing and promoting Kendrick Lamar’s diss track, which he claimed spread a false and harmful narrative.
Notably, Kendrick Lamar was not named in the lawsuit; Drake targeted UMG as the label releasing both artists’ music.
The feud featured a series of back-and-forth diss tracks with escalating harsh rhetoric exchanged over several months in 2024.[2][6][1]
Impact and Industry Response
“Not Like Us” was a major commercial success and critical hit for Lamar, winning five Grammy Awards in 2025, including Song of the Year and Record of the Year.
Lamar performed the track during the 2025 Super Bowl halftime show, further cementing its cultural impact.
UMG condemned the lawsuit as an attack on artistic expression and expressed satisfaction with the court’s dismissal, reaffirming support for Drake’s career.
Drake’s legal team stated their intent to appeal the ruling.[7][8][1]
Judge’s Remarks on Context
The judge highlighted the nature of the dispute as “perhaps the most infamous rap battle in the genre’s history,” involving “increasingly intense rhetoric, loaded accusations, and violent imagery.”
She noted the context of profanity, trash-talking, and hyperbolic insults typical in this art form means such statements are not reasonably interpreted as facts.[9][1]
Sophia Clarke is a senior international journalist with nine years of experience covering global politics, human rights, and international diplomacy.
She earned her M.A. in International Relations and Journalism from the University of Oxford (2016), where she specialized in global governance, conflict reporting, and cross-cultural communication.
Sophia began her career as a foreign correspondent for BBC World Service and later joined The Guardian, where her insightful analyses and on-the-ground reporting from Europe, the Middle East, and Latin America earned her recognition for accuracy and integrity.
Now based in Paris, France, Sophia contributes to Faharas NET, providing comprehensive coverage of diplomatic affairs, humanitarian issues, and policy developments shaping the international landscape. Her storytelling combines investigative depth, journalistic ethics, and a strong commitment to amplifying underrepresented voices in global dialogue.
Billboard is the online platform for Billboard, an American music and entertainment media brand known for its music charts, industry news, and events. As the digital home for the magazine, it provides daily music news, artist interviews, videos, and access to its influential charts like the Billboard Hot 100 and Billboard 200.
Elena Voren is a senior journalist and Tech Section Editor with 8 years of experience focusing on AI ethics, social media impact, and consumer software. She is recognized for interviewing industry leaders and academic experts while clearly distinguishing opinion from evidence-based reporting.
She earned her B.A. in Cognitive Science from the University of California, Berkeley (2016), where she studied human-computer interaction, AI, and digital behavior.
Elena’s work emphasizes the societal implications of technology, ensuring readers understand both the practical and ethical dimensions of emerging tools. She leads the Tech Section at Faharas NET, supervising coverage on AI, consumer software, digital society, and privacy technologies, while maintaining rigorous editorial standards.
Based in Berlin, Germany, Elena provides insightful analyses on technology trends, ethical AI deployment, and the influence of social platforms on modern life.
