In Progress
Dark circuit board background with glowing blue and red lines symbolizing technology and trade tensions between China and the United States.
UPDATED CN

Beijing accuses the US of increasing trade tensions and defends rare earth restrictions

China criticizes US tariffs, defends rare earth controls

China calls US tariffs hypocritical and maintains export controls on rare earth elements. Tensions have escalated, impacting markets and potential diplomatic meetings.

  • China calls US tariffs hypocritical
  • Defends rare earth export controls
  • US imposes 100% tariffs on Chinese exports
  • Tensions impact Wall Street and tech stocks
  • China emphasizes military concerns
  • China seeks negotiation, no immediate US retaliation

China defended its newly expanded rare earth export controls on October 12, 2025, calling US President Donald Trump’s tariff threats hypocritical while stopping short of imposing immediate retaliatory measures. The exchange followed China’s October 9 announcement of restrictions on five additional rare earth elements and Trump’s October 10 threat of an additional 100% tariff on Chinese goods, escalating tensions that sent US markets into sharp decline [1][2][3].

China Expands Rare Earth Export Controls

On October 9, 2025, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued regulatory notices expanding export restrictions to cover 12 of 17 rare earth elements, adding holmium, erbium, thulium, europium, and ytterbium to previously restricted materials [4][5]. The new controls, taking effect November 8 and December 1, 2025, extend beyond raw materials to include downstream processing equipment, refining machinery, and related technical know-how used in defense, semiconductor, and advanced manufacturing applications [6].

China controls over 90% of global processed rare earth output and rare earth magnet production. The expanded framework now covers foreign producers manufacturing rare earth products using Chinese materials or equipment, requiring special licenses that detail end-use applications [7]. Beijing stated it would expedite approvals but deny applications related to defense uses and rigorously examine those involving advanced semiconductors and artificial intelligence technologies [8].

Trump Threatens Additional 100 Percent Tariffs

President Trump responded on October 10, 2025, threatening to impose an additional 100% tariff on Chinese imports beyond the existing 30% tariffs, effective November 1, 2025 [9][10]. In a Truth Social post, Trump stated there was “no reason to meet” with Chinese President Xi Jinping at a previously scheduled October meeting in South Korea, calling China’s export controls “surprising” and “hostile” [11].

The announcement included plans for export controls on “any and all critical software” manufactured in the United States. Trump characterized the move as responding to China’s actions after months of relative trade stability following a May 2025 90-day truce that had reduced tensions between the two countries [12].

Market Reaction and Economic Impact

US stock markets experienced sharp declines on October 10, 2025, following Trump’s tariff announcement:

  • S&P 500 fell 2.7%, the steepest single-day drop since April 10, 2025
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average declined 1.9%, losing 878 points
  • Nasdaq Composite dropped 3.5%, leading losses among major indexes
  • Technology stocks extended losses in after-hours trading, with Nvidia, Tesla, Amazon, and Advanced Micro Devices each falling over 2% [13]

The S&P 500 recorded its largest weekly decline since May 2025, while the Nasdaq posted its steepest week-over-week drop since April [14]. Analysts at 22V Research noted the moment represents significant risk for global supply chains, particularly those supporting artificial intelligence development, though neither side had implemented threatened measures as of October 12 [15].

Beijing Response Emphasizes Legitimacy

China’s Ministry of Commerce stated on October 12, 2025, that US complaints about rare earth export controls revealed “double standards,” noting that “China’s export controls are not export bans” [1]. The ministry linked recent US actions, including blacklisting Chinese companies and imposing tariffs, to deterioration in the atmosphere for bilateral trade discussions [16].

Beijing cited national security and military application concerns as justification for export restrictions while refraining from announcing new tariffs on US products. The ministry emphasized China does not want trade conflict but remains prepared to respond if necessary, stating that threatening high tariffs is not an effective negotiation strategy [17].

Diplomatic Implications

The absence of immediate Chinese retaliation may indicate willingness to maintain diplomatic channels. Previous April 2025 tariff exchanges saw rates on Chinese goods reach 145% before both nations agreed to scale back duties [18]. The current restraint from Beijing, despite Trump’s escalatory rhetoric, suggests potential openness to negotiation before November 1 implementation deadlines.

Analysts note the fragility of bilateral deal-making between the world’s two largest economies. Chris Zaccarelli at Northlight Asset Management observed that October 2025 fulfilled expectations as a volatile trading month, though absent significant economic damage, markets could rebound by year-end [19].

Outlook for Trade Relations

Both nations face pressure to de-escalate before November 2025 deadlines. China’s decision to expand export controls while avoiding immediate tariff retaliation preserves negotiation options, though the cancellation of the planned Xi-Trump meeting eliminates a key diplomatic opportunity for October [20].

European and global manufacturers dependent on Chinese rare earth supplies face operational uncertainty and longer delivery timelines. Previous April 2025 rare earth restrictions caused temporary automotive production halts worldwide due to magnet shortages [21]. The November and December 2025 implementation of expanded controls will require companies to re-evaluate supply chain, compliance, and contractual frameworks for defense, medical technology, semiconductor, and advanced manufacturing sectors.

US and Chinese officials have not announced alternative diplomatic engagement timelines as of October 12, 2025. Market observers expect continued volatility through the fourth quarter absent clear signals of renewed negotiation efforts or tariff rollback commitments from either government.

Rachel Patel

Rachel Patel

Senior News Editor

US Business

Rachel Patel is a senior news editor and journalist specializing in political journalism and digital media. With over seven years of professional experience, she is recognized for her accuracy, source verification, and audience-focused reporting approach. Rachel earned her M.S. in Journalism & Media Studies from Stanford University (2018), where she developed expertise in media ethics, political communication, and digital storytelling. Her career has centered on bridging traditional political reporting with the fast-paced world of online journalism. She has contributed to major global media outlets, analyzing how digital platforms — from YouTube and Reddit to TikTok and Bluesky — shape political narratives, influence public opinion, and redefine news consumption. Now based in Berlin, Germany, Rachel serves as a Senior News Editor at Faharas NET, leading coverage on digital politics, media literacy, and social communication trends in the modern information landscape.

85
Articles
1.2K
Views
31
Shares
Reuters

Reuters

Primary Source

No coverage areas yet

Reuters began in 1851 when German entrepreneur Paul Julius Reuter used carrier pigeons to bridge a 120-mile telegraph gap between Aachen and Brussels, beating post trains by four hours and giving London stockbrokers the fastest continental prices. Within months the service migrated under the English Channel, and by 1865 the first transatlantic cable carried Reuter’s bulletin announcing Abraham Lincoln’s assassination Global News Rooted that reached European capitals three days ahead of competing papers. That obsession with speed married to accuracy became the DNA of an agency that today files 2.2 million words a day in 16 languages from 200 bureaus. A legal trust written into Reuters articles of incorporation in 1941 amid fears of wartime propaganda enshrines five principles: independence, integrity, freedom from bias, resistance to political or commercial interference, and the duty to supply “the whole truth when it can be obtained.” Editors repeat those lines to every new hire; they are printed on plastic cards clipped to security badges and cited in court when the company refuses subpoenas for unpublished material. The trust is overseen by a 15-member board that includes former supreme-court justices and Nobel laureates who can veto any merger or shareholder action deemed to threaten neutrality. Modern coverage spans text, photo, video, graphics and structured data fed directly into trading algorithms. During the 2020 U.S. election the Washington bureau’s “Decision Desk” called Arizona for Joe Biden at 12:50 a.m. EST, 34 minutes ahead of competitors, after analysts cross-checked 4.1 million early-vote records against county turnout models built from 20 years of precinct returns. Simultaneously, the Bangalore data unit published machine-readable county-level XML feeds that allowed Bloomberg, Refinitiv and 300 regional newspapers to update electoral maps on their own sites within seconds. Financial markets rely on Reuters Instrument Codes (RICs), a proprietary ticker system covering 80 million assets from Venezuelan bonds to Korean won options. When the Bank of England surprised traders with a rate hike in February 2023, reporters filed a 78-word headline plus a 12-field data table in 0.7 seconds; high-frequency funds parsed the code and moved £4 billion in gilt futures before the average human could finish reading the first sentence. Beyond speed, investigative teams spend months on accountability journalism. The “Daughters of the Nile” series documented forced disappearances in Egypt using satellite imagery, TikTok metadata and smuggled prison ledgers; judges in Cairo cited the evidence to overturn 23 death sentences. Similarly, the “Congo Cobalt” file traced child-mined ore through shell companies to battery supply chains, prompting Tesla and Apple to publish third-party audits within weeks. Every bureau maintains a “Standards Editor” who vets adjectives, double-blind sources and insists on corroborating documents. Stories carry a byline, a dateline and a time-stamp to the minute, creating an audit trail that academics, regulators and rival newsrooms treat as the closest thing to an official record. From telegraph wires to 5G networks, Reuters still delivers Independent the first draft of history unaltered by ideology and accountable to the public trust written into its charter 162 years ago.

129
Articles
1.7K
Views
0
Shares
Elena Voren

Elena Voren

Senior Editor

Blog Business Entertainment Sports News

Elena Voren is a senior journalist and Tech Section Editor with 8 years of experience focusing on AI ethics, social media impact, and consumer software. She is recognized for interviewing industry leaders and academic experts while clearly distinguishing opinion from evidence-based reporting. She earned her B.A. in Cognitive Science from the University of California, Berkeley (2016), where she studied human-computer interaction, AI, and digital behavior. Elena’s work emphasizes the societal implications of technology, ensuring readers understand both the practical and ethical dimensions of emerging tools. She leads the Tech Section at Faharas NET, supervising coverage on AI, consumer software, digital society, and privacy technologies, while maintaining rigorous editorial standards. Based in Berlin, Germany, Elena provides insightful analyses on technology trends, ethical AI deployment, and the influence of social platforms on modern life.

0
Articles
0
Views
0
Shares
410
Updates

Editorial Timeline

Revisions
— by Elena Voren
Add SEO improvements
— by Nodin Laramie
  1. Complete article rewrite with verified data as of October 11, 2025
  2. Updated all facts, statistics, and quotes from 10+ authoritative sources
  3. Added BLUF opening summary with who, what, when, where, why, how
  4. Rewrote in classic HTML format with proper H2 headings and structure
  5. Expanded rare earth export controls section with Oct 9 announcement details
  6. Added Trump October 10 tariff threat and cancellation of Xi meeting
  7. Included detailed market impact data from October 10, 2025
  8. Enhanced Beijing response section with Oct 12 official statements
  9. Added diplomatic implications and negotiation prospects analysis
  10. Included forward-looking 2026 context for supply chain impacts
  11. Updated all three FAQ answers with detailed verified information
  12. Added 21 numbered citation links to authoritative sources
  13. Maintained neutral tone, Grade 8 readability, and SEO optimization

Correction Record

Accountability
— by Nodin Laramie
  1. Updated all statistics and market data to October 10–12, 2025.
  2. Corrected China's rare earth control details to reflect October 9, 2025 expansion.
  3. Adjusted all quotes and statements by officials to October 8–12, 2025 timeframe.
  4. Removed any previous data and opinions older than October 8, 2025.
  5. Clarified diplomatic meeting cancellation date and context.
  6. Ensured all citations match the latest sources.

FAQ

Why did China respond to the US tariffs?

China views the US tariffs as hypocritical and harmful.

How are trade tensions affecting markets?

US stock markets fell sharply on October 10, 2025, with the S&P 500 down 2.7%, the Dow dropping 1.9%, and the Nasdaq declining 3.5%. Technology stocks including Nvidia, Tesla, Amazon, and Advanced Micro Devices extended losses in after-hours trading, each falling over 2%. The declines represented the steepest single-day drops since April 2025.

What is China's stance on negotiation?

China stated on October 12, 2025, that it does not want trade conflict but remains prepared to respond if necessary. The Ministry of Commerce emphasized that threatening high tariffs is not an effective negotiation strategy. China's decision to avoid immediate retaliatory tariffs while expanding export controls suggests a willingness to preserve diplomatic channels despite the cancellation of the planned Xi-Trump meeting.